Mate I've never liked MacGill for a long time. Hoggy has been in great form for WA in 4day and OD and Aus in ODI's for ages PLUS he can bat a bit. Plus Im West Australian. Plus MacGill isn't liked by this own team mates. I havent jumped on any bandwagon - I'm the one who's driving it. So shut your hole.
And btw there is no way I would ever say Hodge should be in any team....
You've started your 'comeback' to me in poor fashion. "I've never liked MacGill for a long time" makes no sense.
The difference between starting a bandwagon and being in a bandwagon is? Like Hitler saying he wasn't a Nazi cause he started it. MacGill isn't liked by his team mates? What the hell gives you the right to say that. Australian players would NEVER bad mouth their team mates so you wouldn't know anyway and I've been to many NSW development camps and Stuart is joking around, having fun and his team loves him. Even if the team didn't like him it means absolutely nothing. Its a game of cricket. Ganguly anyone?
Australia don't need a batter by the way. Hogg shouldn't be in the team as a "spinner who can bat' for him to be in the team he has to be the best spinner in Australia. Judging your knowledge of the sport, I'm sure you've seen how well Australia have done with the bat. They don't need him as a batter.
Sorry, but I'm sick to death of it. MacGill has performed for years and years, 96% of the time his played with Warne his taken more wickets than him, and taking wickets is what test cricket is about. Of course I'm not saying he was ever better than the great man Warne by the way! But he averages 5 wickets a game as I said and has an exceptional record. The Hobart test was the only real test I can remember when his performed badly. This is where I got the Ponting analogy from. He performs bad for a bit and the whole country wants him out.. If Ponting got a pair would you be leading the bandwagon to kick him out and replace him with one of your ever so loved Western Australians?
Now, I'm not saying that MacGill should be in the team at the moment. I actually think Hogg should be. MacGill is waaay out of his fitness and while I think his the better option, at the moment, I would pick Hogg, however no person needs the amount of disrespect you're throwing at them, let alone the second best leg spinner over nearly a decade.
He was just giving a comment his personal opinion don't atack him seriously man this is a place for fun and cricket :happy
I don't get all this hatred towards Graeme Smith. I think he's fantastic.
- Sean Tait (dopey, massively over rated, arrogant)
- Andre Nel (ugly s.o.a.b plus crap)
- Stuart MacGill (w.t.f is he doing in the test side over Brad Hogg?)
Andre Nel (Thinks he is Micheal Holding but is crap)
VVS Laxman (Plays well in patches only, not agile and blocking Yuvi's place)
Stephen Fleming (Overated as Captain, done nothing to be called gr8 captain)
Sreesanth (Worst bowler to come out of India in last 2 years)
Imran Khan Niazi = !!The greatest captain.. ever
Brian Charles Lara = Legend.. King.. best batsman ever..
Wasim Akram = Best fast bowler ever...
Shane Keith Warne = Best spinner ever...
Andrew Flintoff = Best Allrounder ever..
Herschelle Gibbs- Just generally dont like him, thinks hes better than he is
Andre Nel- Over-rated, arrogant sob, dont like him
How is he dopey? I also fail to see how he is massively over-rated, just take a look at his record.
200 international wickets seem to disagree with your assessment of him being crap.
Because he's a much better bowler. I would've thought that was painfully obvious, even for one so biased as yourself.
As I said previously, 200 international wickets disagree with you.
He's not blocking Yuvraj's place, because he deserves to be in the Test side ahead of Yuvraj. Also, you're saying he isn't agile. Did you see the catch he took off Anil Kumble's bowling in the last Test match? Superb.
I can only assume you've never studied Fleming, or the Black Caps, indepth.
Haha, how about VRV Singh? Ajit Agarkar? Ishant Sharma?
Very debateable.
That is just plain wrong.
Glenn McGrath, Sir Richard Hadlee, Malcolm Marshall are all bowlers who could be considered superior to Wasim Akram. There is a few more too.
I agree with you, but it's not fact. Muttiah Muralitharan has a very good claim for that title.
There are atleast a dozen all-rounders in the history of the game who have been superior to Andrew Flintoff.
He is pretty good though. One of the best international batsmen South Africa have ever had.
Andre Nel- Over-rated, arrogant sob, dont like him
How is Nel over-rated?
How is he dopey? I also fail to see how he is massively over-rated, just take a look at his record.
200 international wickets seem to disagree with your assessment of him being crap.
Because he's a much better bowler. I would've thought that was painfully obvious, even for one so biased as yourself.
As I said previously, 200 international wickets disagree with you.
He's not blocking Yuvraj's place, because he deserves to be in the Test side ahead of Yuvraj. Also, you're saying he isn't agile. Did you see the catch he took off Anil Kumble's bowling in the last Test match? Superb.
I can only assume you've never studied Fleming, or the Black Caps, indepth.
Haha, how about VRV Singh? Ajit Agarkar? Ishant Sharma?
Very debateable.
That is just plain wrong.
Glenn McGrath, Sir Richard Hadlee, Malcolm Marshall are all bowlers who could be considered superior to Wasim Akram. There is a few more too.
I agree with you, but it's not fact. Muttiah Muralitharan has a very good claim for that title.
There are atleast a dozen all-rounders in the history of the game who have been superior to Andrew Flintoff.
He is pretty good though. One of the best international batsmen South Africa have ever had.
Andre Nel- Over-rated, arrogant sob, dont like him
How is Nel over-rated?