why? the thread only says " Best cricketer that never played a test?"
Because you could throw in hundreds of names for sides before they became Test nations, or during bans like South Africa - where's the point in that?!?!?!/
Seems somewhat unfair to say David Hussey or Sales was a "better cricketer" than Sathasivam when Sathasivam's plight was he never had the oppertunity while Sales and David Hussey was that there was always too many better batsmen available.
Why on earth are you cross comparing and drawing conclusions A is better than B or C?!?!? I merely said that I thought it would be a better thread for having only players who were eligible to play in a Test than over-complicate with players who couldn't play because their country was banned. Yeah we know some cricketers missed out on playing because of bans or they hadn't yet become a Test nation, but why draw out a big list that means nothing because we KNOW why they didn't play Tests. Sales or Hussey are more interesting to discuss because you don't know for sure why they haven't played - especially given some of the rubbish that has played Tests.