Be serously!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
andrew_nixon said:
I'm simply saying that cheaterr is associating gay with bad. This is quite clearly homophobic. Imagine if he'd said the following:-

"Yes, but you know how american schools are really Indian. They will suspend you even if you didnt fight. If some kid punches you and you punch him back you both are getting suspended for a few days. America has the most Indian rules on fights, they don't even let you fight back!"

This would quite rightly be considered as bigotry. It's the same thing.

you haven't answered my question. I simply asked if you think there is anything good about it?
 
Shailesh said:
you haven't answered my question. I simply asked if you think there is anything good about it?
As I am not gay, I have no reason to say that it is good. But it certainly isn't bad. Surely that is obvious? Surely this is the same as associating a particular skin colour with "bad"?

Why should "gay" be associated with "bad"? People are born gay, so why should this association be acceptable?
 
hahaha. this is a funny thread.

Looks like this thread should be read by a psychologist given some complex issues and problems being talked about.
 
well it is clearly unnatural. if it not natural I don't see why it may be good. and your comparison of a form of behavior with race/skin color just doesn't make sense.
 
Shailesh said:
well it is clearly unnatural. if it not natural I don't see why it may be good. and your comparison of a form of behavior with race/skin color just doesn't make sense.
Unnatural? Homosexuality is exhibited throughout the animal kingdom, including in our fellow primates. The comparison with race/skin colour does make sense, as homosexuality is not a choice, it is simply the way someone is born. All recent psychological research has shown that ones sexual orientation is in almost all cases not voluntary, ie. we have no choice over our sexual orientation. Homosexuals are a minority, yes, but then so are left handed people. To be frank, attitudes like yours belong in the 19th Century.
 
andrew_nixon said:
To be frank, attitudes like yours belong in the 19th Century.

you seem to think everything that belonged in our past was wrong? will In some cases it's better to have 19th century values..otherwise things in this world can go wrong pretty quickly. what if someone starts justifying orientation towards children? sure some psychological research will back that too. and then may be that too will be acceptable for people like you.
in that case and in this, I'm glad I have 19th certury or may be 16th century attitude.
 
Shailesh said:
what if someone starts justifying orientation towards children? sure some psychological research will back that too. and then may be that too will be acceptable for people like you.
What the hell are you on about? Of course there is nothing wrong with "justifying" sexual orentation to children, because there is absolutely nothing wrong with being gay! Of course if someone is pressuring a child to be gay, then that is wrong. The fact of the matter is that the vast majority of child abusers are completly heterosexual.

Also I find your bigotted attitude to be completely disgusting. I have no wish to be assoicated with a forum where bigots like you are accepted as staff members. Expect this to be my last post in the forum.
 
You can do whatever you like but you are not just a big hypocrite (since not to long ago you were talking of freedom of opinion) but also judgmental (I do know some gay people and no, I don?t hate them as you may think) and disrespectful towards people.
 
I think there's a clear difference between freedom of opinion and articulating attitudes that are unacceptable in modern society. It is a slippery slope once you start saying that people can say what they like because of freedom of speech. Stirring up hatred for religious, racial or sexual reasons is completely unacceptable and is in fact a crime in most civilised countries. Not that I am accusing Shailesh of doing that but I would certainly agree that his attitude would be offensive to homosexuals and heterosexuals alike.
 
andrew_nixon said:
I'm simply saying that cheaterr is associating gay with bad. This is quite clearly homophobic. Imagine if he'd said the following:-

"Yes, but you know how american schools are really Indian. They will suspend you even if you didnt fight. If some kid punches you and you punch him back you both are getting suspended for a few days. America has the most Indian rules on fights, they don't even let you fight back!"

This would quite rightly be considered as bigotry. It's the same thing.
omg I aint the only one you know. 90% of people who grew up in America will call something bad gay...just calm down man. I wasn't grown up in England you know, I was grown up here and over here if something is bad we most likely call it gay
 
barmyarmy said:
I think there's a clear difference between freedom of opinion and articulating attitudes that are unacceptable in modern society. It is a slippery slope once you start saying that people can say what they like because of freedom of speech. Stirring up hatred for religious, racial or sexual reasons is completely unacceptable and is in fact a crime in most civilised countries. Not that I am accusing Shailesh of doing that but I would certainly agree that his attitude would be offensive to homosexuals and heterosexuals alike.

all I said is in my opinion it is not natural and not good..you or others may disagree or find it perfectly ok. fine man, where is the problem? but does that justify the way people are reacting, accusing and labeling me?
 
You don't here in America boys and girls have sexual after skool in the park or they go each other house. This the fact they are also showed in an american news channel. Mostly it happens in Middle skool and high skools. If you don't belive me you can ask Nikhil(cheaterr).
 
yo listen up i go to school i live in canada not in delhi delhi is my home hood.. and it happens here live life... just enjoy the life WHO CAre If people are beening sexual or anything Are you doing it no it doesn;t matter what you think to them your not gonna be able to stop them so Why u complianing america is the same as canada its just on you how you take and do the stuff you see!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top