andrew_nixon
Chairman of Selectors
I was talked into coming back, when I realised that not all staff members are narrow minded bigots.zimrahil said:What happened - just cannot keep away ?
I was talked into coming back, when I realised that not all staff members are narrow minded bigots.zimrahil said:What happened - just cannot keep away ?
andrew_nixon said:I was talked into coming back, when I realised that not all staff members are narrow minded bigots
andrew_nixon said:I was talked into coming back, when I realised that not all staff members are narrow minded bigots.
Wow, you actually thought that? You amaze me. After what has happen between me and Andrew in the past I would've never thought that.Shailesh said:just when I thought we finally have no arrogant hypocrites in the staff members..now we do.
Yes I agree. This whole thing needs to calm down. I think a small comparision started this entire thing and now it has fueled into something big.Ste said:I think that on this issue everyone needs to calm down. This forum is a cricket forum and although it has a general chat section, topics and views expressed should not interfere with partipation on the rest of the forum.
Also no matter what peoples views are on issues, I think that the arguments about such views should not be made personal. I think there should perhaps be some apologies after some of the remarks made on this topic, throughout life everyone has to deal and work alongside people whos views they dont agree with and put this to one side to co-operate on more important issues which benefit everyone.
Hopefully something can be sorted out here between people taking this personally and using it as an excuse to bring up other problems against people.
Ste
Ritwik, its not about the topic of discussion, its about how the topic is discussed.ritwik said:I think it is the time to say "sorry" from all parties involved and just get on with the primary function of this forum, which is discussion on cricket and cricket games.
The most important requirement for this is that one should not assume that they know everything, and hence shouldn't make irresponsible comments like "homosexuality was not seen in the past (!)". The purpose of any discussion is to augment your knowledge and learn to use it more fruitfully, that can be done only if one curtails their ego/pride/arrogance and are willing to live with others' opinions.
I wouldnt suggest banning such sort of a discussion. The topic is debatable, but it is important that one doesnt use the topic as a tool to insult others. If you have an opinion on the subject then you are free to mention, but there is no point in questioning someone else's point of view. This, I am afraid, is exactly what has happened in this thread.ritwik said:I'd like everyone's opinions on this, as I am really not sure whether we are ethically correct in banning/curtailing any sort of discussion, but when it is weighed against the possibility of such instances recurring in the future, then it attains some theoretical justification.