Hello everyone,
I picked up both Brian Lara International 2005 and Cricket 2005 from my software distributor last week.
Brian Lara 2005 feels very arcadey (priority being given to action) and Cricket 2005 feels like a simulation (at least it seems and moves realistically).
Cricket 2005 feels and plays very much like the old Brian Lara 99. In fact, some of the commentary sentences are also exactly same (though spoken by different commentators) and are triggered by similar events. Camera options in Cricket 2005 also seem as though they were borrowed from Brian Lara 99.
Did anybody else notice this? I was actually looking forward to playing Brian Lara 2005 more but it seems that Cricket 2005 is going to play like Brian Lara 99 and that's what I am actually after.
Also, I haven't played Cricket 2004.
I picked up both Brian Lara International 2005 and Cricket 2005 from my software distributor last week.
Brian Lara 2005 feels very arcadey (priority being given to action) and Cricket 2005 feels like a simulation (at least it seems and moves realistically).
Cricket 2005 feels and plays very much like the old Brian Lara 99. In fact, some of the commentary sentences are also exactly same (though spoken by different commentators) and are triggered by similar events. Camera options in Cricket 2005 also seem as though they were borrowed from Brian Lara 99.
Did anybody else notice this? I was actually looking forward to playing Brian Lara 2005 more but it seems that Cricket 2005 is going to play like Brian Lara 99 and that's what I am actually after.
Also, I haven't played Cricket 2004.