lol, random kev?
Yes, the "I don't know what drugs are" defence, I can see it coming from a mile off already. Not that he argued that defence, only zMario did.They saved his life from what could have been more than just a ban.
THe PCB has already stated they will not back Mohammad Asif. They have also asked for all the expenses that the PCB had to pay for him during the Dubai Airport incident back as well.Yes, the "I don't know what drugs are" defence, I can see it coming from a mile off already. Not that he argued that defence, only zMario did.
Whoever overturned the ban (was it the court of Pakistan or the PCB appeals board?) is an idiot, Asif is a cheating scumbag and I couldn't care less if his life and reputation are ruined. I don't want to start a war here, but this would not happen in Australia or England, and this just shows you how ridiculous certain cricket boards are.
Oh for sure, it's clear that all drug testing in world cricket needs to be admissible to a central body, rather than this farcical localised process where one player can escape the rules that other players are subjected to.You've told me nothing I don't already know. It's an anomaly if a test is wrong. I do agree that it makes perfect sense to have a second sample, I didn't put my point across well though. That point being that a second sample showing the opposite of the first sample is very small. To expect it would give a different result isn't realistic.
I haven't put my point across well though, but it doesn't matter, tests could show that Asif has smoked all the opium in Afghanistan, we all know he'll be treated with a feather duster as opposed to an iron fist.