New to Cricket, quick question

WickeySticket

County Cricketer
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Profile Flag
Canada
Been watching a lot of games on TV recently this year.

One thing I see batsmen do a lot is scratch up the front of their crease. What are they doing that for?

Thanks,
JB
 

icyman

ICC Chairman
India
The Boys
Joined
May 17, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Profile Flag
India
Good luck charm, mate :p

Actually most of them make their mark- as in the taking of the guard. Generally, the batsman would take help from the umpire at the bowlers end. Mostly, the guard is taken in between the middle and the leg stump.
 

qpeedore

SOTM Winner - July 2014
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Location
Trinidad and Tobago
To expand on that, what the batsman is doing is effectively marking wherever that particular stump is, just right at his feet. That way when he gets into his stance he knows exactly where the stumps are behind him. He doesn't need to look back at the stumps wondering exactly where he is. It also lets him stand in pretty much the same position ball after ball.

The batsman comes to the wicket, looks at the stumps and then places it vertically along a particular line, either asking the standing umpire (who is in a perfect spot to see the relationship between where the bat is and the stumps) for his preferred line or where the bat is. So sometimes you'd hear "Leg stump, mate," meaning that the bat is supposed to be vertically in line with leg stump. If the batsman wants a leg stump guard, he uses the spikes on his boot, a bail, or very occasionally even the toe of the bat itself to make a mark where the leg stump line is.

The most common, as mentioned before is middle and leg, meaning the bat, when held vertically, is on a line between the middle and leg stumps. You'd pretty much never see a batsman taking an off stump guard. Middle is tricky, but it happens from time to time. Middle and leg is the most common, and leg is second most common.

Some batsmen will start their innings on a particular guard before changing it as they settle. Some batsmen will take different guards to different bowlers. Sometimes due to pitch wear and tear, etc, the original mark made by the batsman is getting difficult to see, so they just make it clearer by more scratching.

Long post, but to be honest, the whole taking the guard thing mystified me for years before I realised I was actually doing it for a long time, just using my own judgement without an umpire (street/backyard cricket rarely has those, of course) and without the scratching.
 

Ahmad94

Staff Member
Moderator
PAK...
KK
Joined
Mar 21, 2011
Location
West Midlands, UK
Online Cricket Games Owned
  1. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
take guard, so they know where the wickets are behind and if they move around without exposing the wicket or looking behind
 

sifter132

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Location
NSW
Some batsmen do it as a concentration thing too. Marking your guard is seen as the right way to start your innings, so occasionally after a batsman plays a really awful shot you see him re-marking his guard - basically as a way of making his brain restart his innings again with the right mindset ie. forget that last shot!
 

icyman

ICC Chairman
India
The Boys
Joined
May 17, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Profile Flag
India
Soem even have an interesting way of taking guards- for e.g- the former West Indian captain- Shivnarine Chanderpaul, who knocks a bail into the pitch. He also has a weird stance, which makes it further interesting seeing as how successful he has been for his country.
 

angryangy

ICC Chairman
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
It's interesting to watch old footage of Shiv where he stood side on, but actually squared up to play the ball. Now he does the opposite, with his characteristic 'two-eyed' guard, but stepping into a more orthodox position and mostly only keeping the back foot out when actually looking to hit square.

It's amazing how many left handers employ some sort of step across the stumps and how many times they've been among the finest players in the world, yet every time it's utterly confounding to the cricket public, experts and pundits alike. It goes back at least as far as Arthur Morris.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top