So what you're saying is DBC14 will need to be made in 20 odd days...? I quite understand Biggs' comment of "what?". What you said made no sense whatsoever.
And for the record, comparing the car industry to the cricket gaming industry (if we can call it that) is bloody stupid. In the car industry, the name is relevant. You don't say, "That car with the shoddy brakes." You'd call it a Toyota. The car industry is very saturated, and the brand name directly correlates to quality and characteristics, so the name IS vital. The gaming industry, and in particular the cricket gaming industry, is much different. When you first see an article with the announcement of a new cricket video game, you would say to your mates, "I heard there's a new cricket game coming out!" You then see that a cricket game was so shit it got canned from Steam. The cricket gaming industry is completely unsaturated. You would automatically think it's the same game. And if your rebuttal is that you're highly intelligent and wouldn't make that error, well then let me put it this way - the average person would. Hence if you don't want that crappy cricket game, and you see that a cricket game is being released, you (or your average person) would presume the same game is being re-released and wouldn't purchase it. I know my train of thought is pretty muddled up but the point I'm trying to make is that name is relevant in the car industry, but not in the (cricket) gaming industry. Thus the period since AC13's bust up, Ross, BA and TB/HES have had to handle the situation very delicately.
.
