VB Series in Australia

it doesnt matter how they performed,all that matters is the result.
 
Originally posted by sachin@Jan 9 2004, 06:45 AM
india's demise has nothing to do with bangar,personally it would have to be with ganguly,tendulkar,sehwag,dravid and laxman,all terrible shots.shame on you(fellows up above).
Sachin and Sourav batted really well. It was really Dravid and Laxman who caused this to happen. Everone knows that Inda cant rely on their tailenders ever like Australia or South Africa could. Sehwag is a different story. He usually gets out playing a stupid shot. So u should actually say that Sachin and Sourav batted well and were the reason that India even came so close to winning.
 
laxman is not good enough for the ode-day version of the game.
 
Originally posted by sohaibaslam@Jan 9 2004, 08:04 PM
By looking this permance of India, I reckon Pakistan will have trouble when India tour Pakistan.
B) as far as pakistan can solve their problems regarding selection
captain and coach and amir sohail,

pakistan has world class players and they can beat any team on thier day

but it is really a shame to know people dont care about thier team and country .

like shoiab akhtar
 
I think seeing these recent performances by India.. they are going to nail pakistan and win their first Test Match and series there!
 
Originally posted by jeromedascorp+Jan 10 2004, 03:04 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jeromedascorp @ Jan 10 2004, 03:04 AM)</div>
<!--QuoteBegin-sachin
@Jan 9 2004, 06:45 AM
india's demise has nothing to do with bangar,personally it would have to be with ganguly,tendulkar,sehwag,dravid and laxman,all terrible shots.shame on you(fellows up above).
Sachin and Sourav batted really well. It was really Dravid and Laxman who caused this to happen. Everone knows that Inda cant rely on their tailenders ever like Australia or South Africa could. Sehwag is a different story. He usually gets out playing a stupid shot. So u should actually say that Sachin and Sourav batted well and were the reason that India even came so close to winning. [/b]
they both batted well until they got them selves out in a really stupid way (referring to gangulies dismissals),i'm very dissapointed with sachins in particular because i though tmyself while i was at the game if he gets to the hundred(team score) without getting out he'll get a hundred,and guess what he got to the team score of 100 and then he got out to an alright par timer.the part timers got all the main wickets. :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:
 
What are you talkin' bout, Part Timers? The only part timer that got a wicket was Michael Clarke. Symonds and Harvey aren't Part Timers, they get a bowl every game they're in, they're All Rounders.
 
symonds is a part timer(good one at that)and ian harvey is a bowling allrounder.i was just pointing out that gellespie or williams or bichle didn't get main wickets.
 
Symonds is an Allrounder as well, he is just a batting Allrounder not a Bowling Allrounder like Harvey
 
exactly.but compared to some allrounders they are not that good.
 
the indian batter can handle the better bowlers but not the bad ones/thats what i mean.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top