Your custom tours

Pakistan's home games need to happen in pakistan, not anywhere else. It is quite ridiculous that they have not been able to convince bcci ICC about security.

Pakistan is not safe to tour, so there will not be international cricket there.

There are better places to hold the games than Dubai though. Did they get a reasonable crowd when they had games in England against Australia?
 
Pakistan is not safe to tour, so there will not be international cricket there.

There are better places to hold the games than Dubai though. Did they get a reasonable crowd when they had games in England against Australia?

Surely that would be a better option to play the games in England.

I do feel for the majority of Pakistani's who love cricket and miss out because of a small minority of idiots.
 
would be great if they hosted Pakistan matches in countries with a good local Pakistani crowd, like England or something (just a guess).

Hell...they might as well start hosting 'home' games for the NZ Black Caps at Cheltenham Drive oval at the Gold Coast :lol there will lots of 'local' support! he he
 
would be great if they hosted Pakistan matches in countries with a good local Pakistani crowd, like England or something (just a guess).

Hell...they might as well start hosting 'home' games for the NZ Black Caps at Cheltenham Drive oval at the Gold Coast :lol there will lots of 'local' support! he he

The Gold Coast is the largest New Zealand city.

I worked at a customer service centre on the GC a few years back and we had about 300 people employed. I would say 70% of them were from NZ.
 
I would love to make a few contests both in Tests and ODIs.

1. 1979 West Indies v 1948 Australia
2. 1979 West Indies v 1982 South Africa
3. 1979/83 West Indies v 2003/4 Australia
4. 1948 Australia v 2003 Australia (if possible)
5. 1979/83 West Indies v 2007/2011 India
6. 1979 West Indies v 1992 Pakistan
7. 1983 West Indies v 1983 India
8. 1979 West Indies v 2012/13 South Africa
 
I would like to play a test series between the two greatest fast bowling eras: 1890s and 1970s

so on team 1 I would have:
SF Barnes, Tom Richardson, Fred Spofforth and George Lohmann

and on team 2:
Malcolm Marshall, Dennis Lillee, Michael holding and Joel Garner.
 
The Gold Coast is the largest New Zealand city.

I worked at a customer service centre on the GC a few years back and we had about 300 people employed. I would say 70% of them were from NZ.

lol for a moment there after I posted it...I assumed I was going to get flamed big time! :lol (it is true though!)
 
I would love to make a few contests both in Tests and ODIs.

1. 1979 West Indies v 1948 Australia
2. 1979 West Indies v 1982 South Africa
3. 1979/83 West Indies v 2003/4 Australia
4. 1948 Australia v 2003 Australia (if possible)
5. 1979/83 West Indies v 2007/2011 India
6. 1979 West Indies v 1992 Pakistan
7. 1983 West Indies v 1983 India
8. 1979 West Indies v 2012/13 South Africa

I reckon you'd want an earlier South Africa to make it more competitive - by this time Richards, Pollock, Procter, Rice and Van der Bijl were past their best, and even the "youngsters" were mostly over 30. Procter was semi-retired by then. When Peter Kirsten was appointed Captain in 1982 he was the second youngest guy in the team at 28.

The SA team under Ali Bacher that had just whooped the Aussies 4-0 before isolation, that team would be an awesome team to make/play. or maybe a later version (say mid-70s) where you could bring van der Bijl in.

----------

I would like to play a test series between the two greatest fast bowling eras: 1890s and 1970s

so on team 1 I would have:
SF Barnes, Tom Richardson, Fred Spofforth and George Lohmann

and on team 2:
Malcolm Marshall, Dennis Lillee, Michael holding and Joel Garner.

SF Barnes made his test debut in 1901 ;)
 
I did realize that when I wrote it but I was hoping no-one would mind...I should've known better. :facepalm

you need to check my signature ;)

well he was playing FC from 1894 according to cric info.

just wondering what your 11s would be for both those teams?
 
1970s:

S.Gavaskar
G.Greenidge
G.Chappell
V.Richards
J.Miandad
I.Khan
R.Marsh
M.Marshall
M.Holding
D.Lillee
J.Garner


1890s/ Pre WWI

W.G.Grace
A.Shrewsbury/ Trumper (if you would allow it)
S.Jackson
K.Ranjitsinjhi
C.Bannerman
J.blackham
H.Trumble
T.Richardson/ S.F.Barnes (if you would allow it, although I'm not 100% sure it would be Richardson I'd take out.)
J.J.Ferris
F.Spofforth
G.Lohmann
 
Last edited:
not sure i'm gonna allow anything as you missed out Tom Hayward ;)

and if making it a pre WWI team I am not sure how you can leave out Jack Hobbs
 
not sure i'm gonna allow anything as you missed out Tom Hayward ;)

and if making it a pre WWI team I am not sure how you can leave out Jack Hobbs

I just called it a pre WWI team because of Barnes and Trumper, perhaps a Victorian team would be a better name? And I had to go with Bannerman over Hayward simply for the romance of it.
 
I reckon you'd want an earlier South Africa to make it more competitive - by this time Richards, Pollock, Procter, Rice and Van der Bijl were past their best, and even the "youngsters" were mostly over 30. Procter was semi-retired by then. When Peter Kirsten was appointed Captain in 1982 he was the second youngest guy in the team at 28.

The SA team under Ali Bacher that had just whooped the Aussies 4-0 before isolation, that team would be an awesome team to make/play. or maybe a later version (say mid-70s) where you could bring van der Bijl in.
I think you are correct. What a contest that would be! Also some of the best XIs against the WI XI with the likes of the 3Ws and all would be absolute delight to play.
 
I just called it a pre WWI team because of Barnes and Trumper, perhaps a Victorian team would be a better name? And I had to go with Bannerman over Hayward simply for the romance of it.

As you gotta make 12 players before you can use it Hayward can be 12th man!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top