Warne reckons Strauss is "disrespectful" of Test cricket by not touring Bangladesh. What tripe. I'm sure he's not the first to miss matches for a rest, didn't Poncing rest for two ODIs over here? It's a tour that needed to be fitted in a hectic schedule, does Warne believe it disrespectful to play only every now and then against some Test nations and only two Tests while maintaining regular five Test series against others?!?
I think it's far more disrespectful of Test nations to pretty much ignore other nations, like playing Bangladesh only four times in the decade they've been a Test nation - applies equally to England and Australia to date
BBC Sport - Cricket - Strauss' Bangladesh absence 'disrespectful', says Warne
Tests/series vs Bangladesh
12/6 Sri Lanka
8/4 New Zealand
8/4 South Africa
8/4 Zimbabwe
7/4 India
6/3 Pakistan
6/3 West Indies
4/2 England
4/2 Australia
We'll pretty soon shoot up with these two series, but once every five years is not that regular for a two Test series slot. Sri Lanka and Pakistan played Bangladesh in the Asian Test Championship of 01/02, only Sri Lanka play Bangladesh with any great regularity and I'm sure that's in part to get Murali records
And if Warne wants to cite 'disrespect' and one day cricket dying, how come he doesn't say not playing Ireland, Zimbabwe and Kenya (more) is 'disrespectful' ?!? Australia have played Kenya four times in ODIs, two of those were World Cup matches. Both of England's ODIs vs Kenya were at World Cups, England do play Ireland occaisionally but do Test playing nations support developing sides as much as they could?!? The zimmers are still playing ODIs, but Australia haven't played them since 03/04 nor have England since 04/05 (but have played plenty of politics over the country). Sri Lanka, South Africa, Bangladesh, Pakistan and West Indies have all played them in 07/08 or more recently. New Zealand and India haven't played them since 05/06.