England are horrible at T20's. No idea what you guys are on about. Pakistan are clear favorites to win this.
Exactly. England have had some high points in ODIs since 1992 but haven't been a major force in limited overs since then. I think it's too much theorising with selections, wrapped up in numbers of bowlers, specialist batting and bowling vs all-round cricketers, OD specialists vs quality, types of bowlers, batting keeper vs keeper specialist etc. It doesn't matter so much in Tests, you pick your best players, but we chop and change so much in ODIs that it's hard for the quality cricketers to get a chance. I mean Strauss should never have been dropped from ODIs, and then of course several keepers have been tried and dumped by OPENING with them and finding they all average about 22 when opening.
But for me the key in T20s is almost the perverse reverse of what happens in ODIs. We pick specialist ODI players for ODIs, but then when we play T20 a lot of the England squad that plays Tests and ODIs remain even though they hardly play T20 for their counties.