First series lost for Clarke. Now to put my theory in, once you break a streak the thing that broke will keep happening for a while. Hopefully, not winning a series is not a streak.
----------
In the words of that guy from Sky Sports coming in to WIN the series without a senior bowler was just "crazy". This wasn't a match that we could afford to win, draw it was one that HAD to be won yet where the hell were the other bowlers?
I know I said that Hilfenhaus shouldn't be playing but I forgot that Johnson and Starc leak runs a lot and Hilfenhaus is quite economical.
Main question of the match: Who led the bowling attack?