Which is the problem which i've been saying all along with Krejza. Tasmania domestic line-up isn't going to pick him since like Ponting: - George Bailey doesn't know how to use him - Tasmania dont have 4 strong quicks like (3 quicks + Watson) like what AUS would have. So that Krejza could be used properly, thus they pick Doherty since he suits their FC team balance better. The dumb selectors picked Hauritz & persisted with him foolishly for two years when he wasn't even in NSW team as you would remember. So IMO they can do the same with Krejza again, since @ least he has basic skills to is proven recipe for some success for spinners in test history. ---------- Well no i dont believe he will always go for runs, its certainly possible for him to bowl a spell on the occasion where he goes for less than 4 rpo. I just believe he will never be able to tie-down & end for a captain which MacGill never used to do i.e bowling a spell of 30-10-60-2 If Krejza consistently gives AUS every time they encounter a 4th/5th day turner/wearing a spell of 30-2-150-6 for eg, he would have done his job. Him being expensive wouldn't be relevant. Thats a very interesting theory my friend, which in all my years of watching cricket & seeing both leg & off-spinners bowl (the excellent, good & crap ones) i must say i have seen no evidence of the above.