Why is everyone so surprised about how well we are playing? Recently we've turned our form in the complete opposite direction in white ball cricket and in my opinion,Finch and Warner have been one of the most dominant opening pairs in ODI since 2015. India however have been playing West Indies, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh for the longest time now and have now been faced with a team of equal, maybe even greater skill. Without a doubt England is still the best ODI in the world but I believe that Australia is a better team with everyone fully fit because as shown in the World Cup Semis vs NZ, if that top 4 is out early, the game is over.
Agreed that we definitely lack a consistent spinner as well as Mitch Marsh getting back into the ODI lineup, average in mid 30s and handy with the ball. His fitness is always an issue when it comes to white ball cricket because I can't remember the last time he performed badly in One Day cricketAustralia hadn't won a single ODI series for nearly two years until last year's victory in India if I'm correct and played a similar style of stodgy, slow cricket that India are doing right now. I remember the ODI series right after the Ashes down under where Finch would score a century patiently to take Australia to a total near 300, only for England to comfortably chase it down. The turnaround from that to the more aggressive style of modern ODI cricket is excellent and bodes well with the current bowling lineup. If they could find a good spinner and get Mitch Marsh back in the side as the all-rounder, Australia might very well challenge England for the title of the best ODI team.
I do think West Indies deserve greater respect though, given that they nearly won a series versus us.![]()
Excellent from the Aussies. I'm not surprised with this result. I also feel the gap between the teams is vastly exaggerated because the Aussies have batted at a time where there is due and the ball is flying off the bat. Kuldeep bowled really well with no luck and Jadeja still needs Dhoni behind the sticks. He just starts bowling darts when the wicket is flat.
The batting line up?
It's madness in my book to even contemplate moving Rohit and Kohli in the order. I think, India need to respect what Dhawan has done for us in the white ball format, specially in ICC tournaments, but keeping Rahul out right now is criminal. You can almost feel that he's on the cusp of breaking through. I think Iyer was settling in nicely at 4 and there's no need for this shuffling around. Dhawan should be our reserve opener and de facto choice regardless of form as long as he's fit.
Rohit
Rahul
Kohli
Iyer
Pant
Jadeja
Pandya
Kuldeep
Saini/Shami
Bhuvi
Bumrah
I am shocked Jadeja is still floundering around at 7. He's ready to bat 6 and we need a 6th bowler as seen so many times!
Spot on!
Rahul looked to have finally turned a corner in 50 over cricket with his opener plus keeper role for Karnataka and was performing consistently for India too. He has now played as an opener, number three, number four and even as the finisher once over the past year for India. Tinkering with his position to this extent is ludicrous.
I swap Pandya and Jadeja in your lineup, Pandya IMO has the potential to bat even at five if he is properly given the role of a batting all-rounder and disregard for spinners is taken advantage of fully. Also, I would have Shami as a certainty in the ODI lineup, he is the closest we have to a strike pacer in the mould of Starc and I would rather have a bowler go for an extra 10-15 runs if it means they take a couple of wickets more. And given that the next WC is in India after all, I wouldn't mind playing the spin twins together depending on conditions.
One thing that I found strange was the number of boundaries the Aussie openers were able to hit with ease. They were constantly finding the gaps in comparison to the Indian batsmen. Just how much of it is truly attributable to dew and how much is it down to good field placements by the respective captains? I've seen RCB, another team captained by Kohli constantly suffer from needlessly conceded boundaries in gaps that are too exposed whenever they are under the slightest of pressure.
And finally, just why do we insist on cramming every top order batsman into the lineup (Three natural openers, two top order batsmen who like to be the number three and a keeper who was once an opener and prefers batting at least one if not two positions higher)? I appreciate that Kohli and Shastri can find out issues with our lineup like the lack of batting depth, weak middle order (including Jadhav's role as a passenger in every game) but their solutions to these issues have never really been consistent and we see constant changes instead. If you need a middle order batsman capable of scoring from the start, play someone like Dube who has more sixes than fours in domestic white ball cricket. If you want a more consistent batsman, pick someone like his captain in Surya Yadav who starred at five as the finisher this season. Why is Shankar suddenly out of the frame and demoted to the A team when he has all the characteristics needed to be a part of the side (part time bowler, can go big if needed, has experience in the middle order)?
This management is a joke. I want India to lose in group stages in world cup this year so that they are force to remove Kohli-Shastri duo from their respective positions.[DOUBLEPOST=1579152802][/DOUBLEPOST]Since Pant is not playing, I would play Manish Pandey in place of him.Sanju Samson dropped after being picked after 4 years and playing 2 balls in the last T20 series.. Great for him and his confidence!![]()
This management is a joke. I want India to lose in group stages in world cup this year so that they are force to remove Kohli-Shastri duo from their respective positions.[DOUBLEPOST=1579152802][/DOUBLEPOST]Since Pant is not playing, I would play Manish Pandey in place of him.
Couldn't watch the game today, can anyone say how good the batting lineup performed today?