angryangy said:
Ok, before I go to bed, I'm going to make some (possibly ridiculous) predictions.
Bracken - ugly start, recovers, mediocre game - 0/60ish
Tait - matchwinning performance - 6/60
McGrath - doesn't cop as much stick as Pollock - 3/45
Watson - plays like a total noob - 8 an over until he's pulled 0/50
Hogg - tidy spin, a crucial wicket, won't get enough overs - 1/30
Symonds - undercooked, will probably get too many overs - 0/60
Bracken - had an ugly start and recovered, but bowled much better.
Tait - did snare the hard hitters Boucher and Kemp, but not the ridiculous six wickets.
McGrath - didn't cop as much stick as Pollock, but it seems I had McGrath and Bracken confused in my crystal ball.
Watson - wasn't quite a total noob, but he could've been if the batsmen were right to take him on. I knew as soon as I left that I should have factored in a runout.
Hogg - got his full complement and was all over the top order
Symonds - was undercooked, but didn't get too many overs
Reasonable.
The overall numbers were pretty good, though, from that I'd given all out for 305, just 11 runs over. I guess it's because the game played how I felt it was, offering plenty for South Africa, but unlike Auckland, where we saw the same key bowlers fail to defend 336, Australia had the edge in the field and the bowlers are playing like it's a World Cup.