Sando
Club Cricketer
Sureshot said:If you're looking at ODIs, not many ODI averagea really reflects the batsmans ability.
For example. Afridi 24, Vaughan 28, Flintoff 30 (iirc), etc.
You're right, averages don't gauge ability, they gauge productivity, and when I last checked the most important thing when it comes to batting is the number of runs you make and how long it takes you to make them. Does Katich strike the ball as hard as Afridi or Flintoff? Nope. Does he drive the ball with the elegance that Vaughn does? Not even close, and it doesn't matter one little bit. Katich will fight hard at the top of the order and seldom give his wicket away to an ill-advised shot, allowing him to frequently protect his middle order from the new ball and the oppositions best bowlers.
That's what is frustrating me about the current Katich/Jacques debate, no one seems to care that in his past 20 knocks, he's past 50 on six occasions and 30 on twelve occasions.
52, 19, 0, 60, 2, 36, 54, 47, 58, 30, 36*, 5, 43, 58, 0, 5, 9, 0, 76, 38.
That's good production for an opener, and if he's striking it at 75, he's hardly holding the team back.
tsyrmas said:and lets hope the latter is the case. exactly why should he be "rested though"? its not like hes had a bad series
I don't have a problem with him being rested (not that he really needs it now that he is out of the Test side), but I reckon at this stage he deserves to be in Australia's best XI when fit. I'm actually hoping Jacques gets another crack during the prelim matches, he certainly deserves it.