TNA Or WWE {Prove Your Program Best By Discussion}

[Hitterman]

OR


Hey Everybody tell your views about the wrestling shows!Which one is better TNA Which is new Or WWE A Historical wrestling show!Give reasons by posting and vote on the poll! :

 

[The Spin]

Here is a question, how many people actually watch TNA? I doubt there are many

TNA are far better, but WWE will win the poll because, OMGZ THEY HAVE THE UBER GREAT KHALI! ROTFLMAOLOL

:

 

[RoboRocks]

TNA is weird to me, they have strange matches and poor commentators

 

[kuttakumar]

Well I had voted for both.TNA could have been better if it had multiple sub-brands like WWE whic has 3(RAW , SD , ECW).At the momment WWE is better because its WWE..But in the future TNA might take the lead.

 

[The Spin]

TNA can't afford to maintain 3 different rosters because the are a smaller company. Also, WWE only started having 2 different rosters fairly recently (5/6 years if my memory serves me.

 

[kuttakumar]

TNA is weird to me, they have strange matches and poor commentators

What do you mean by strange matches?With the exception of Ultimate-X matches all the type of matches are similar to those of WWE.Only difference is that the ring has a hexagonal structure.And regarding the commentry I would agree with you.The commentators and back stage inter-viewers are poor indeed.

 

[puddleduck]

When I used to actually watch wresting which was now a good 7-10 years ago, WWE (WWF as it was then) was the more glitzy and glamourous (with only one roster) whilst WCW was it's poorer cousin and then there was ECW. ECW was class, the arenas were small, the actors were all prepared to go all out with their stunts and the commentators and back stage stuff was hilariously bad, it actually looked like (and may well have been for all I know) it was filmed in some blokes Mums basement Fully expected to see her come in and ask if they were done yet so she could hang up the washing

Personally I can't believe that the likes of Hogan, Flair and others that are surely past the legal retirement age are still going

 

[Kev]

I'd rather cut my head off then use it as a football (in a field thats used by inconsiderate dogwalkers) that watch either

 

[RoboRocks]

When I used to actually watch wresting which was now a good 7-10 years ago, WWE (WWF as it was then) was the more glitzy and glamourous (with only one roster) whilst WCW was it's poorer cousin and then there was ECW. ECW was class, the arenas were small, the actors were all prepared to go all out with their stunts and the commentators and back stage stuff was hilariously bad, it actually looked like (and may well have been for all I know) it was filmed in some blokes Mums basement Fully expected to see her come in and ask if they were done yet so she could hang up the washing

Personally I can't believe that the likes of Hogan, Flair and others that are surely past the legal retirement age are still going

I agree WWE has really gone down hill from what it used to be.
I loved the alliance story that was great.
Now nothing comes close to it.
Plus no Stacy Kiebler any more :crying

 

[Hitterman]

i watch wwe only for the undertaker!

 

[RoboRocks]

What about DX?
You have a DX avatar and sig?

 

[Hitterman]

I forgot dx cena kane hardys!!yeah... two words for u DX SUX!

 

[RoboRocks]

I don't get it.
You have a DX sig and avatar and now you say DX SUX?

 

[Hitterman]

Leave that!DX IS GREAT!Thats OKAY!

 

[Jaztheman]

I'd rather cut my head off then use it as a football (in a field thats used by inconsiderate dogwalkers) that watch either

Kev what is the point in posting in which is better tna/wwe or both and you say neither i dont watch it. Theres no need to post here :

as for me i prefer WWE because it has better storylines and i enjoy some of the matches more but on the otherhand TNA have more movess/ flying moves. But WWE still gets my vote